NOTES OF EXCHANGE (PROTOCOL 2) TO THE CONVENTION BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL WITH RESPECT TO TAXES ON INCOME
颁布时间:1993-01-26
Minister of Foreign Affairs
Jerusalem, 26 January, 1993
His Excellency
Mr. William C. Harrop
Ambassador of the
United States of America in Israel
Excellency, I have the honour to refer to your Note of 26 January 1993
confirming the understandings stated in the Note and reached between our
two governments. relating to the Convention between the Government of the
United States of America and the Government of the State of Israel with
Respect to Taxes on Income, and the First and Second Protocols thereto,
and to inform you of the Agreement of my Government to these
understandings.
These understandings constitute an agreement between our two
Governments on this matter, which shall enter into force on the day of
entry into force of the Convention between the Government of the United
States of America and the Government of the State of Israel with respect
to Taxes on Income and the First and Second Protocols thereto.
Accept, Excellency, the renewed assurances of my highest
consideration.
(s) Shimon Peres
EMBASSY OF THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Tel Aviv January 26, 1993
His Excellency
Shimon Peres,
Minister of Foreign Affairs
of the State of Israel, Jerusalem.
No. 020
Excellency: I have the honor to refer to the Convention between the
Government of the United States of America and the Government of the State
of Israel with Respect to Taxes on Income, and the First and Second
Protocols thereto, and to confirm certain understandings reached between
the two Governments:
1. In subparagraph (b) of paragraph (1) of Article 1 (Taxes Covered),
the phrase "other taxes on income administered by the Government of
Israel" is understood to include only taxes imposed solely under Israeli
law.
2. In paragraph (3) of Article 1 (Taxes Covered), the phrase
"political subdivision thereof" is understood to include local
authorities.
3. In subparagraph (a)(ii) of paragraph (1) of. Article 3 (Fiscal
Residence), the term "person... resident in Israel" is understood to
include persons on whom taxes are imposed by Israel pursuant to the Income
Tax Ordinance on income from sources outside of Israel by virtue of their
being Israeli citizens.
4. In paragraph (3) of Article 3 (Fiscal Residence), it is understood
that when one of the provisions of the Convention cited in the paragraph
is operative, all other provision of the Convention necessary to
apply the cited provision in the manner intended also will be operative.
For instance, if a dual resident makes a dividend payment subject to
paragraph (2) of Article 12 (Dividends), other articles of the Convention,
such as Article 4 (Source of Income), will apply to the extent necessary
to ensure proper treatment according to this Convention.
5. In applying the last sentence of paragraph (6) of Article 4 (Source
of Income), it is understood that section 865(h) of the United States
Internal Revenue Code may apply to require a taxpayer to determine the
foreign tax credit separately with respect to the United States tax on
gain from the sale of stock in an Israeli corporation to which the source
rule in that sentence applies.
6. It is agreed that if the United States hereafter alters its policy
regarding the provision of a tax sparing credit, or if the United States
reaches agreement on the provision of a tax sparing credit with any other
country, the Convention shall be promptly amended to incorporate such a
provision.
7. Paragraph (8) of Article 6 (General Rules of Taxation) recognizes
that future changes in the law or domestic policy of either Contracting
State may make it appropriate to amend the Convention.
Examples of changes that may justify amendment are understood to include,
but are not limited to, the following:
(i) the decision by one Contracting State to extend favorable treaty
benefits to a third country (such as a liberalization of the double
taxation relief provided by foreign tax credits) so that the other
Contracting State would be justified in requesting similar benefits under
this Convention; and
(ii) changes in the domestic law of one Contracting State (such as
integration of corporate and individual taxation) so that either that
Contracting State or the other Contracting State could reasonably be
requested to extend benefits under this Convention similar to benefits
granted under treaties of that Contracting State with other countries.
It also is understood that the parties will consult about possible
amendments to the Convention in the event that one Contracting State
adopts domestic rules that treat expenses incurred within that Contracting
State more favorably than expenses incurred in the other Contracting
State, so long as the Free Trade Area Agreement between the United States
and Israel is in force.
8. In paragraph (2) of Article 10 (Grants), it is understood that a
grant shall not be considered to be "taxed by Israel" solely by reason of
the fact that the grant is not included for Israeli income tax purposes in
the basis of stock or assets.
9. In subparagraph (b) of paragraph (3) of Article 12 (Dividends), it
is understood that there are several different ways in which an Israeli
corporation may be taxable in a "pass-through" manner such that its income
would be included within the scope of the subparagraph. For instance, the
corporation may be exempt from tax, the shareholders may be taxable on
their pro rata shares of the corporation's income, or the corporation may
be entitled to deduct from its taxable income dividends paid to shareholders.
10. It is understood that paragraph (8) of Article 13 (Interest) has
been added at the request of the United States to address a problem of
domestic tax avoidance arising under the internal laws of the United
States. The United States intends to include similar provisions in all of
its future treaties. Israel understands that if the United States were to
revise its internal laws in the future to address this problem in a manner
other than by imposing tax on the recipient of the excess inclusion,
excess inclusions under the revised laws would be treated as ordinary
interest income in the hands of nonresident recipients and would be
eligible for the exemptions from tax applicable to interest income under
the laws of the United States. It is further understood that, should the
United States fail to include a provision similar to paragraph (8) of
Article 13 in its treaties signed subsequent to the entry into force of
this Convention, without having revised its internal laws as aforestated,
such a change in U.S. treaty policy would make it appropriate to amend the
Convention on this matter, pursuant to paragraph (8) of Article 6 of the
Convention
11. In paragraph (2) of Article 14-A (Branch Tax), it is understood
that if Israel imposes its tax under subparagraph (b) of paragraph (2) in
circumstances in which the United States will not impose its taxes under
subparagraph (a), the competent authorities will consult with a view to
conforming the rules under the Convention. It is further understood that a
resident of a Contracting State that qualifies for benefits under the
Convention shall not be subject to a branch tax imposed by the other
Contracting State except in accordance with the Convention.
12. In paragraphs (1) and (2) of Article 15 (Capital Gains), it is
understood that ownership "directly or indirectly" includes constructive
ownership through related persons.
13. In Paragraph (3) of Article 25 (Limitation on Benefits), it is
understood that the competent authority of a Contracting State may be
expected to grant benefits under this Convention to a resident of the
other Contracting State that fails to qualify under subparagraph (b) of
paragraph (1) solely by reason of a bona-fide loan from a financial
institution not resident in either of the Contracting States.
14. The competent authorities of the Contracting States will develop
an agreed Memorandum of Understanding intended to give guidance both to
taxpayers and tax authorities of our two countries in interpreting Article
25 (Limitation on Benefits). As experience is gained in administering the
Convention, as amended by the Protocols, and particularly Article 25, the
competent authorities may develop and publish further understandings and
interpretations.
15. In paragraph (4) of Article 26 (Relief from Double Taxation) it is
understood that, for purposes of providing relief from double taxation in
the United States, the terms "stock" and "intangibles" are limited to
those interests for which an election relating to foreign tax credit
relief is provided under United States law.
16. It is understood that any reference in the Convention to a
currency of a Contracting States shall be deemed to refer to the legal
tender of that Contracting State as renamed or replaced from time to
time.
I confirm these understandings on behalf of the Government of the
United States of America. Upon confirmation by your Government, these
understandings shall constitute an agreement between our two Governments
on this matter, which will enter into force on the day of entry into force
of the Convention between the Government of the United States of America
and the Government of the State of Israel with Respect to Taxes on Income
and the First and Second Protocols thereto.
I would be grateful if you would confirm that these understandings are
shared by your Government.
Accept, Excellency, the renewed assurances of my highest
consideration.
(s) William C. Harrop