DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY TECHNICAL EXPLANATION OF THE CONVENTION BETWEEN
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND THE PREVENTION OF FISCAL E
颁布时间:1998-01-15
GENERAL EFFECTIVE DATE UNDER ARTICLE 28: 1 JANUARY 2000
This is a technical explanation of the Convention between the United
States and the Republic of Estonia signed on January 15, 1998 (the
"Convention"). Negotiations took into account the U.S. Treasury
Department's current tax treaty policy and the U.S. Treasury Department's
Model Income Tax Convention published on September 20, 1996 (the "U.S.
Model") between the first and second rounds of negotiations for this
Convention, as well as the Model Income Tax Convention On Income and On
Capital published by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development, as updated in November, 1997 (the "OECD Model") and recent
tax treaties concluded by both countries. The Technical Explanation is an
official guide to the Convention. It reflects the policies behind
particular Convention provisions, as well as understandings reached with
respect to the application and interpretation of the Convention.
References in the Technical Explanation to "he" or "his" should be read to
mean "he or she" or "his or her".
TABLE OF ARTICLES
Article 1---------------------------------General Scope
Article 2---------------------------------Taxes Covered
Article 3---------------------------------General Definitions
Article 4---------------------------------Resident
Article 5---------------------------------Permanent Establishment
Article 6---------------------------------Income from Immovable (Real)
Property
Article 7---------------------------------Business Profits
Article 8---------------------------------Shipping and Air Transport
Article 9---------------------------------Associated Enterprises
Article 10--------------------------------Dividends
Article 11--------------------------------Interest
Article 12--------------------------------Royalties
Article 13--------------------------------Capital Gains
Article 14--------------------------------Independent Personal Services
Article 15--------------------------------Dependent Personal Services
Article 16--------------------------------Directors' Fees
Article 17--------------------------------Artistes and Sportsmen
Article 18--------------------------------Pensions, Social Security,
Annuities,
Alimony, and Child Support
Article 19--------------------------------Government Service
Article 20--------------------------------Students, Trainees and Researchers
Article 21--------------------------------Other Income
Article 22--------------------------------Limitation on Benefits
Article 23--------------------------------Relief from Double Taxation
Article 24--------------------------------Nondiscrimination
Article 25--------------------------------Mutual Agreement Procedure
Article 26--------------------------------Exchange of Information and
Administrative Assistance
Article 27--------------------------------Members of Diplomatic Missions
and Consular Posts
Article 28--------------------------------Entry into Force
Article 29--------------------------------Termination
ARTICLE 1
General Scope
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1 of Article 1 provides that the Convention applies to
residents of the United States or Estonia except where the terms of the
Convention provide otherwise. Under Article 4 (Resident) a person is
generally treated as a resident of a Contracting State if that person is,
under the laws of that State, liable to tax therein by reason of his
domicile or other similar criteria. If, however, a person is considered a
resident of both Contracting States, Article 4 provides rules for
determining a single state of residence (or no state of residence). This
determination governs for all purposes of the Convention.
Certain provisions are applicable to persons who may not be residents of
either Contracting State. For example, Article 19 (Government Service) may
apply to an employee of a Contracting State who is resident in neither
State. Paragraph 1 of Article 24 (Nondiscrimination) applies to
nationals of the Contracting States. Under Article 26 (Exchange of
Information and Administrative Assistance), information may be exchanged
with respect to residents of third states.
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2 states the generally accepted relationship between the
Convention and domestic law and between the Convention and other
agreements between the Contracting States (i.e., that no provision in the
Convention may restrict any benefit accorded by the tax laws of the
Contracting States, or by any other agreement between the Contracting
States.) The list in paragraph 2 contains examples of benefits not to be
restricted and is not intended to be exhaustive. For example, if a
deduction would be allowed under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (the
"Code") in computing the U.S. taxable income of a resident of Estonia, the
deduction also is allowed to that person in computing taxable income under
the Convention. Paragraph 2 also means that the Convention may not
increase the tax burden on a resident of a Contracting State beyond the
burden determined under domestic law. Thus, a right to tax given by the
Convention cannot be exercised unless that right also exists under
internal law. The relationship between the nondiscrimination provisions of
the Convention and other agreements is not addressed in paragraph 2 but in
paragraph 3.
It follows that under the principle of paragraph 2 a taxpayer's
liability to U.S. tax need not be determined under the Convention if the
Code would produce a more favorable result. A taxpayer may not, however,
choose among the provisions of the Code and the onvention in an
inconsistent manner in order to minimize tax. For example,
assume that a resident of Estonia has three separate businesses in the
United States. One is a profitable permanent establishment and the other
two are trades or businesses that would earn taxable income under the Code
but that do not meet the permanent establishment threshold tests of the
Convention. One is profitable and the other incurs a loss. Under the
Convention, the income of the permanent establishment is taxable, and both
the profit and loss of the other two businesses are ignored. Under the
Code, all three would be subject to tax, but the loss would be offset
against the profits of the two profitable ventures. The taxpayer may not
invoke the Convention to exclude the profits of the profitable trade or
business and invoke the Code to claim the loss of the loss trade or
business against the profit of the permanent establishment. (See Rev. Rul.
84-17, 1984-1 C.B. 308.) If, however, the taxpayer invokes the Code for
the taxation of all three ventures, he would not be precluded from
invoking the Convention with respect, for example, to any dividend income
he may receive from the United States that is not effectively connected
with any of his business activities in the United States.
Similarly, nothing in the Convention can be used to deny any benefit
granted by any other agreement between the United States and the other
Contracting State. For example, if certain benefits are provided for
diplomats under a Consular Convention between the United States and
Estonia, those benefits or protections will be available to residents of
the Contracting States regardless of any provisions to the contrary (or
silence) in the Convention.
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3 specifically relates to nondiscrimination obligations of
the Contracting States under other agreements. The provisions of paragraph
3 are an exception to the rule provided in paragraph 2 of this Article
under which the Convention shall not restrict in any manner any benefit
now or hereafter accorded by any other agreement between the Contracting
States.
Subparagraph (a) of paragraph 3 provides that, notwithstanding any
other agreement to which the Contracting States may be parties, a dispute
concerning whether a measure is within the scope of this Convention shall
be considered only by the competent authorities of the Contracting States,
and the procedures under this Convention exclusively shall apply to the
dispute. Thus, procedures for dealing with disputes that may be
incorporated into trade, investment, or other agreements between the
Contracting States shall not apply for the purpose of determining the
scope of the Convention.
Subparagraph (b) of paragraph 3 provides that, unless the competent
authorities determine that a taxation measure is not within the scope of
this Convention, the nondiscrimination obligations of this Convention
exclusively shall apply with respect to that measure, except for such
national treatment or most-favored-nation ("MFN") obligations as may
apply to trade in goods under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
("GATT"). No national treatment or MFN obligation under any other
agreement shall apply with respect to that measure. Thus, unless the
competent authorities agree otherwise, any national treatment and
MFN obligations undertaken by the Contracting States under agreements
other than the Convention shall not apply to a taxation measure, with the
exception of GATT as applicable to trade in goods.
Subparagraph (c) of paragraph 3 defines a "measure" broadly. It would
include, for example, a law, regulation, rule, procedure, decision,
administrative action or guidance, or any other form of governmental
guidance.
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4 contains the traditional saving clause found in U.S. tax
treaties. The Contracting States reserve their rights, except as provided
in paragraph 5, to tax their residents and citizens as provided in their
internal laws, notwithstanding any provisions of the Convention to the
contrary. For example, if a resident of Estonia performs independent
personal services in the United States and the income from the services is
not attributable to a fixed base in the United States, Article 14
(Independent Personal Services) would by its terms prevent the United
States from taxing the income. If, however, the Estonian resident is also
a citizen of the United States, the saving clause permits the United
States to include the remuneration in the worldwide income of the citizen
and subject it to tax under the normal Code rules (i.e., without regard to
Code section 894(a)).
For purposes of the saving clause, "residence" is determined under
Article 4 (Resident). Thus, if an individual who is not a U.S. citizen is
a resident of the United States under the Code, and is also a resident of
Estonia under its law, and that individual has a permanent home available
to him in Estonia and not in the United States, he would, under the
tie-breaker rules of Article 4 (Resident), be treated as a resident of
Estonia under Article 4 and for purposes of the saving clause. The United
States would not be permitted to apply its statutory rules to that person
if they are inconsistent with the treaty. Such an individual would be
subject to U.S. tax only to the extent permitted by the Convention.
However, that person would be treated as a U.S. resident for U.S. tax
purposes other than determining the individual's U.S. tax liability. For
example, in determining under Code section 957 whether a foreign
corporation is a controlled foreign corporation, shares in that
corporation held by the individual would be considered to be held by a
U.S. resident. As a result, other U.S. citizens or residents might be
deemed to be United States shareholders of a controlled foreign
corporation subject to current inclusion of Subpart F income
recognized by the corporation. See Treas. Reg. section 301.7701(b)-7(a)(3).
Under paragraph 4 each Contracting State also reserves its right to
tax former citizens and long-term residents whose loss of citizenship or
long-term residence had as one of its principal purposes the avoidance of
tax. Consistent with paragraph 2 of Article 3 (General Definitions),
the phrase "as one of its principal purposes the avoidance of tax" as used
in paragraph 4 was understood by the negotiators to be defined under the
laws of the Contracting State of which the person was a citizen or
long-term resident. The United States treats an individual as having a
principal purpose to avoid tax if
(a) the average annual net income tax of such individual for the
period of 5 taxable years ending before the date of the loss of status is
greater than $100,000, or
(b) the net worth of such individual as of such date is $500,000 or
more.
The United States defines "long-term resident" as an individual (other
than a U.S. citizen) who is a lawful permanent resident of the United
States in at least 8 of the prior 15 taxable years. An individual shall
not be treated as a lawful permanent resident for any taxable year if such
individual is treated as a resident of a foreign country under the
provisions of a tax treaty between the United States and the foreign
country and the individual does not waive the benefits of such treaty
applicable to residents of the foreign country. In the United States, such
a former citizen or long-term resident is taxable in accordance with the
provisions of section 877 of the Code.
Paragraph 5
Some provisions are intended to provide benefits to citizens and
residents even if such benefits do not exist under internal law. Paragraph
5 sets forth certain exceptions to the saving clause that preserve these
benefits for citizens and residents of the Contracting States.
Subparagraph (a) lists certain provisions of the Convention that are
applicable to all citizens and residents of a Contracting State, despite
the general saving clause rule of paragraph 4:
(1) Paragraph 2 of Article 9 (Associated Enterprises) grants the right
to a correlative adjustment with respect to income tax due on profits
reallocated under Article 9.
(2) Paragraphs 2 and 5 of Article 18 (Pensions, Social Security,
Annuities, Alimony and Child Support) deal with social security benefits
and child support payments, respectively. The inclusion of paragraph 2 in
the exceptions to the saving clause means that the grant of exclusive
taxing right of social security benefits to the paying country applies to
deny, for example, to the United States the right to tax its citizens and
residents on social security benefits paid by Estonia. The inclusion of
paragraph 5, which exempts child support payments from taxation by the
State of residence of the recipient, means that if a resident of Estonia
pays child support to a citizen or resident of the United States, the
United States may not tax the recipient.
(3) Article 23 (Relief from Double Taxation) confirms the benefit of a
credit to citizens and residents of one Contracting State for income taxes
paid to the other.
(4) Article 24 (Nondiscrimination) requires one Contracting State to
grant national treatment to residents and citizens of the other
Contracting State in certain circumstances.Excepting this Article from the
saving clause requires, for example, that the United States give
such benefits to a resident or citizen of Estonia even if that person is a
citizen of the United States.
(5) Article 25 (Mutual Agreement Procedure) may confer benefits on
citizens and residents of the Contracting States.
For example, the statute of limitations may be waived for refunds and
the competent authorities are permitted to use a definition of a term that
differs from the internal law definition. As with the foreign tax credit,
these benefits are intended to be granted by a Contracting State to its
citizens and residents.
Subparagraph (b) of paragraph 5 provides a different set of exceptions
to the saving clause. The benefits referred to are all intended to be
granted to temporary residents of a Contracting State (for example, in the
case of the United States, holders of non-immigrant visas), but not to
citizens or to persons who have acquired permanent residence in that
State. If beneficiaries of these provisions travel from one of the
Contracting States to the other, and remain in the other long enough to
become residents under its internal law, but do not acquire permanent
residence status (i.e., in the U.S. context, they do not become "green
card" holders) and are not citizens of that State, the host State will
continue to grant these benefits even if they conflict with the statutory
rules. The benefits preserved by this paragraph are the host country
exemptions for the following items: government service salaries and
pensions under Article 19 (Government Service); certain income of visiting
students and trainees under Article 20 (Students, Trainees and
Researchers); and the income of diplomatic agents and consular officers
under Article 27 (Members of Diplomatic Missions and Consular Posts)